|
UV-C TECHNOLOGY ELIMINATES COIL CLEANING, IMPROVES HVAC PERFORMANCE
by Thomas J. Kelly
Product Manager, Indoor Air Quality Products Carrier Corporation, Syracuse, N.Y.
Nearly every service technician
has had the experience of starting an air handler and being greeted by
an odor one could only describe as a "locker room." This experience,
also known as the "dirty socks syndrome," is first-hand evidence of
what happens when mold grows on the coil and in the drain pan of an
air-conditioning unit. Every service technician has also had the
experience of opening a unit to find the drain pan and coil covered
with a slimy residue.
These conditions can be as
unhealthy for building occupants as they are unpleasant. While the
smell associated with mold growth is a bad situation, mold growth on
coils also has a detrimental effect on system performance. This
degradation of performance ultimately leads to higher energy costs and
poor cooling performance.
Numerous coil-cleaning methods
have been used to control this problem. Some of those techniques
involve the use of detergents or even solvents, which can pose safety
issues - health and flammability, for example - and diminish the life
of the coil, because sometimes acids are involved. Often coil cleaning
isn't done with regularity and even when it is done on schedule, the
mold growth can return in a very short time.
The application of C-band
ultraviolet light (UV-C) technology in air-handling systems now allows
for a proactive method of keeping the coil clean and operating in "as
new" performance all the time. UV-C lights can be added to air handlers
and other pieces of equipment through a relatively simple retrofit kit
(Fig. 1), and manufacturers like Carrier also offer them as a
factory-installed option in HVAC equipment.
Interestingly, while UV-C light
has been promoted for its positive impact on indoor air quality (IAQ),
the "bottom line" impact - its contribution to system efficiency and
lower maintenance costs - might ultimately be considered to be its
greatest asset.
Four conditions will result in mold and fungus growth:
1. A source of mold spores.
Sufficient mold spores are found in nearly every environment and
brought into the building through door openings and outdoor air
supplies.
2. Organic material on which the
mold can grow. Dust and particles of organic material are also readily
available in every system, even with the best filtration systems.
3. The right temperature range. Temperatures from 50° F to more than 100° F provide the right incubation range.
4. Moisture, which is in more than adequate supply on cooling coils and drain pans of all air conditioning units.
Even when filtration is provided, a large part of the build-up on the cooling coil is the result of biological growth.
The odors associated with this
problem stem from the natural growth and decay of mold. As the molds
break down they decay into toxins and volatile organic compounds
(VOCs), which cause the characteristic odor. In addition, some people
have allergic reactions to these toxins and VOCs. These problems
certainly contribute to poor building IAQ, but mold growth can impact
energy use through lost performance as well.
Bio-film growth can have a
tremendous impact on coil velocity, putting it considerably off design
specification. A good rule of thumb for evaporator coil size is about
one sq ft. of face area per ton and 400 cfm per ton. If we consider
that a 10-ton unit coil has 10 sq ft. of surface and 4,000 cfm
(400cfm/ton x 10 ton), our gross face velocity is 400 ft per minute.
But this is not the actual velocity through the coil. The fin and tube
material takes up a very large portion of the coil.
Let's consider that our coil is a
typical 14 fin/in. three-row coil with 3/8-in. tubes. The material in
the face of the coil is considerable. With a 0.0055 in. fin thickness,
the fin material alone reduces the free area by 8 percent (14 fins/inch
x 12 inches/ft x 0.0055 fin thickness divided by the 144 inches/sq
ft.). If we also consider that there are 12 tubes in a one-ft. high
section, we reduce the free area by 37 percent more. The actual free
area is now only 5.78 sq ft. and the resultant net face velocity is 692
ft/min.
How does a bio-film build-up
affect the performance? If the bio-film thickness is .002 in. on the
fin and tube surfaces, this will reduce the free area to 5.38 sq ft.
and a velocity of 744 ft/min. What will an increase of 50 fpm mean to
static? From a typical unit coil performance this can result in an
increase of static of 16.5 percent.
However, unless the supply fan is
on a variable frequency drive (VFD), the result is not an increase in
motor horsepower, but instead results in a decrease in supply air. In
our case, the supply airflow decreased by 9 percent to 3,650 cfm to
regain system balance. Performance of a cooling coil is a function of
the amount of coil surface, the amount of time the air is in contact
with the surface and the heat transfer coefficient between the fin,
tube and the air.
From a performance side, what does
it mean to decrease the airflow by 9 percent? If we look at performance
for a 10-ton coil we lose about 3 percent in total capacity. This
analysis looks only at the affects of increased velocity. If we
consider the effects on the heat transfer coefficient, the performance
loss will be even more dramatic.
Coil cleaning can bring performance back to the original operating conditions.
Typical coil cleaning methods include chemical treatments and steam cleaning.
However, recent evidence suggests
that both methods can be ineffective. Chemical cleaning may only remove
surface growth while leaving material still embedded in the center of
the fin pack. Some reports indicate steam cleaning can actually force
the surface growth deeper in the fin pack compressing the growth
material so tightly that the only solution may be a new coil. Both
methods can also be detrimental to some of today's enhanced coil
surfaces.
Coil cleaning is certainly
necessary, but cannot be done economically with the frequency and level
that will keep the coil operating at design conditions on a daily
basis. In essence, with UV-C lights, coil cleaning becomes a
continuous, automatic and labor-free alternative. The UV-C light works
by attacking the DNA of the mold and rendering it sterile so that it
can not reproduce.
Contrasting physical cleaning
methods to the use UV-C light is analogous to the difference between
treating the symptoms and curing the disease.
UV-C technology is not new, as it
has proven itself for years as a way to provide sterilization in
medical and food processing applications. What is new, is the
development of high-energy output UV-C lights that can achieve very
high mold kill rates under the cold temperature and rapid air velocity
conditions of an HVAC system.
The effectiveness of the UV-C
light is a function of the light intensity, the reflectivity of the
space and the distance from the light. In general, if the mold is
exposed to the light for a brief period of time, it will be destroyed.
Aluminum coil fins are a good reflective surface and, as a result, the
UV-C energy is capable of penetrating three- and four-row coils with
excellent results.
Given continuous exposure, UV-C
lights can clean up a coil already contaminated by mold growth and keep
the coil cleaner than other methods.
While UV-C light is an emerging
technology for the HVAC business, it is already starting to prove its
effectiveness. For example, an air handler in an office building in Los
Angeles exhibited the classic problems of bioaerosol film growth. The
air handler shown in Fig. 2 demonstrates the degree of the problem.
Mold growth is evident both on the coil and in the drain pan.
The unit was equipped with a bank
of UV-C lights, as shown in Fig. 3, and its operation was monitored for
30 days. The results are shown in Fig. 4. Within 30 days, the unit was
operating at near design conditions. The coil pressure drop decreased
by 28 percent, resulting in 8.6 percent improvement in airflow. The
coil dry bulb depression had increased by nearly 4° F, providing more
than five tons of sensible cooling.
Wet bulb depression also increased
by 1.8° F, enabling a total capacity increase of seven tons. Continued
use of the light bank kept the air handler operating at the design
conditions.
Other buildings have experienced
similar results. A southwestern utility company applied UV-C lights to
the air handlers in its headquarters office building. The city went
through one of its hottest summers ever. In previous years the standby
chiller was required just to keep up with the load. However, with the
now-clean coils, the extra chiller was never required during the
extremely hot summer.
In most office buildings, the
demand-charge savings alone from this improvement would result in
significant savings. Reduced maintenance costs and improved IAQ are a
welcome bonus.
The ideal location for the UV-C
light is on the discharge side of the cooling coil and mounted so as to
expose both the coil surface and drain pan to as much light as
possible. In general, the light should be positioned about a foot from
the coil surface. As a rule of thumb, the number of lights can normally
be based on one light for each five sq ft. of coil.
The light used for UV-C is not
dangerous, but some common sense installation safety precautions should
be followed when the light is installed. As the UV-C light is similar
to the UV light used for tanning beds, but it's wave band is of a level
such that it does not pose an exposure risk to humans. Selecting the
right light, however, is important. In an HVAC environment, a
traditional UV-C light may lose much of its effectiveness because the
light is located in a cold area with air movement over the coil.
Care must be taken to assure that
materials exposed to the UV light - particularly wiring and plastic
materials - are UV stabilized so they will not degrade over time. While
the concept is simple, reliable performance depends on applying lights
designed for this application and applying them in units where the
safety and compatibility issues have been evaluated.
Typical operation for the UV-C
light is to run the light whenever the fan is operating. Under normal
operation, the light will provide the required output for about one
year of service, at which time a simple change-out is required.
Technology can
be a great thing, but to the user, the real question is: does this
investment pay off? Assume that the first cost of installing two
typical lights for our 10-ton example unit is $400. Also assume that it
takes one hour to install them, so the installed cost is approximately
$500. Contrast this with the cost of manually cleaning the coils. Based
on coil cleaning costs from one service company, our 10-ton coil would
cost $250 to clean. If we could actually get the coil cleaned three
times in a year, which is probably a minimum, the annual coil cleaning
expense would be $750. Since the bulb would be replaced on an annual
basis at a cost of about $100, then our investment should repay itself
in less than one year - just based on maintenance costs. If you
consider the energy savings, the payback can be reduced to a fraction
of that.
Shedding a little UV-C light on
the subject of HVAC systems provides a method of proactive coil
cleaning that can keep coils operating at near design conditions year
round. Coils kept clean of a bioaerosol film perform far better, saving
energy and avoiding the odors associated with a locker room. Reducing
energy costs and improving air quality for building occupants creates
the ideal scenario for any building owner or manager.
|